← All insights
Grow / Framework / NOD perspective

What should count as a valuable lead?

A cheaper inquiry is only the beginning of the calculation. Follow it through qualification, a won customer and the cost of serving the work before deciding what deserves more budget.

THE TAKEAWAY

Judge a lead source by the business it helps you win, not the price of the first response.

The campaign report looks better: more forms, a lower cost per lead. Yet the sales team is spending more time on inquiries that go nowhere. The owner is being asked to increase a budget without knowing whether those responses are worth pursuing.

The first question is not how to get more leads. It is which responses turn into customers the business wants.

Follow the inquiry far enough to see the result

Consider two hypothetical campaigns with the same advertising spend. Both groups of inquiries have had enough time to complete the business’s sales cycle.

If cost per lead decides the budget, Campaign A wins. Following the inquiries through to won customers changes the picture.

MeasureCampaign ACampaign B
Advertising spend$2,000$2,000
Inquiries10040
Cost per inquiry$20$50
Qualified inquiries1020
Won customers25
Advertising spend per customer$1,000$400

Hypothetical figures, not client results. Equal advertising spend and comparable time to mature. Costs shown exclude sales effort and delivery.

Campaign B wins more customers at a lower advertising cost per customer. That makes it worth investigating. It does not yet prove it is the more profitable source: customer value, sales effort and delivery cost still matter.

HBR’s Don’t Let Metrics Undermine Your Business warns that measures can displace business objectives. Here, rewarding only a lower cost per inquiry would favor A even though B wins more customers. The measure should serve the investment decision, not replace it.

Separate a poor fit from a missed opportunity

Before changing campaigns, find out why inquiries fail to progress. An unsuitable request and a suitable inquiry nobody answered need different responses.

Agree observable qualification rules: the service needed, location, timing and whether the business can supply the work. Record why an inquiry is rejected. Keep “awaiting review” separate from “not suitable.”

For Campaign A, many rejected inquiries could point to targeting or an unclear offer. A queue of suitable inquiries waiting for contact would point to the internal process. Calling both “poor leads” hides the decision the business needs to make.

Choose a signal the team can use reliably

A completed sale is meaningful, but it may take months to arrive. Qualification is available sooner, but only helps if people apply the rules consistently. A predicted lead value needs checking against what customers actually buy.

For Campaign B, the practical choice may be to use qualification for regular decisions while continuing to check won customers and their economics. The aim is a useful early signal with a route back to the commercial outcome.

Before relying on a measureAsk thisIf the answer is unclear
Business relevanceDoes improvement mean better prospects or better work?Revisit what the measure is intended to represent.
Reliable collectionIs the same event recorded consistently?Repair definitions and recording before comparing sources.
Useful timingDoes enough information arrive soon enough to act?Use an earlier signal, then check it against later outcomes.

A decision checklist, not a platform-specific bidding rule.

Give someone responsibility for updating inquiry status and returning the results to the people managing acquisition. A maintained lead register can be a useful starting point. A new system will not fix outcomes the team never records.

Test the budget decision against worthwhile business

Before giving Campaign B more money, check the customers it won. Are they buying profitable work? Do they require unusual support? Can the team serve more of them?

Then test a bounded change. Agree what would count as improvement, allow enough time for the sales cycle and watch customer outcomes as well as lead volume. A source can become less effective as spend increases.

The useful conclusion may be more budget, a better qualification process or a change to the offer. Cheaper leads are only progress when they support better business.

TRY THIS WITH TWO RECENT LEAD SOURCES

Compare inquiry fit, follow-up, won customers and the work those customers bought. Give both groups a fair time to mature.

Find the first missing fact before making the next budget increase.

More on Grow ↗

DOES THIS SOUND FAMILIAR?

Cheaper leads. More follow-up. Still not enough worthwhile customers.

Tell us what your campaigns count as a lead and what makes a customer worth serving. We can help you find where the connection between the two breaks down.